Reading History
Showing your last 2 viewed publications
Prevalence of Unorthodox Psychoactive Substance Use Amongst Secondary School Students in Calabar South Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria
Quality secondary education: Principals, teachers and students’ understanding in Ethiopia
Prevalence of Unorthodox Psychoactive Substance Use Amongst Secondary School Students in Calabar South Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria
by Eyo, Mfon
Guided by six research questions, this study adopted survey design to investigate the prevalence of unorthodox psychoactive substance use amongst students. 700 students were drawn from a population of 10,560 students. ‘Prevalence of Use of Unorthodox Psychoactive Substances Questionnaire’ (PUUPSQ) was used for gathering data, which was analyzed using frequency, percentage, bar charts and pie charts. The results showed, amongst others, that 57% of the respondents had taken at least one of the 20 investigated substances, which indicates high prevalence. It was recommended, amongst others, that adequate awareness on these substances should be created amongst the stakeholders in schools. © 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Quality secondary education: Principals, teachers and students’ understanding in Ethiopia
by Asrat Dagnew Kelkay
This study attempted to find out the understanding of principals, teachers and students about quality of education in secondary school. Teachers believe that education quality in terms of input indicators with a total mean of (3.5) near to good. In terms of process indicators with a total mean value of (3.70) near to good. And in terms of output indicators with a total mean value of (3.4) that is fall to on average. As the result of this study indicated, students, teachers and principals perceived process factor of quality education especially student-centered factor below the average. In addition, the one way ANOVA result showed that there is a significant difference between the respondents of input and output factors. On the other hand, there is no significant difference between the respondents on process factors. As a whole they responded that input, process and out factor affect the quality of education. © 2023 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
© 2026 AERD Database System. All Rights Reserved. Developed by Strategic Technologies.